论文部分内容阅读
本期选发的三篇文章,都是我们研究界长期以来较少关注的话题。在“五四”新文学的旗帜下,以往学者对中国现代文学史的梳理大都着力于新的文学特质的挖掘与张扬,而在有意或无意中,事实上却是遮蔽了我国传统文学所具有的强大惯性与影响力,因而,当俞兆平和李钧的两篇论文同时拷问古典主义思潮到底应该在中国现代文学史上占据何种地位时,便具有了重要的学术眼光与价值。而且,在阐述中,材料充分,推理严密,让人信服。
The three articles selected for this issue are topics that have less attention from the research community for a long time. Under the banner of “May 4th” new literature, most scholars in the past focused on the excavation and publicity of the new literary traits in the history of Chinese modern literature. However, they deliberately or inadvertently obscured the traditional Chinese literature Therefore, when Yu Zhaoping and Li Jun’s two essays at the same time torture classicism should occupy the position in the history of Chinese modern literature, it has an important academic vision and value. Moreover, in the elaboration, the material is sufficient, the reasoning is tight and convincing.