论文部分内容阅读
赡养案件执行难的原因,普遍看法是难在儿媳(因女婿在亲戚关系中地位与儿媳相等,故不另列出叙述,下同)以各种借口和理由抵制执行。如李其某诉其子马某某赡养一案,马某某提出自己没有财产可以履行,其妻子王某也拒不同意他以夫妻共同财产履行。又认为夫妻共同财产主要是其个人劳动所得,而人民法院的判决书又没有规定她负有赡养义务。王某拒绝执行的理由究竟有无道理?笔者认为:王某提出的理由是有道理的,至少现在能够成立。她提出了一个显而易见的问题:即人民法院判决书所确认的赡养义务人与最后被执行
The reason why it is hard to support the case is generally felt that it is difficult to resist execution on various excuses and reasons by virtue of being a daughter-in-law (the son-in-law is equal to the daughter-in-law in the relationship between relatives and so is not listed otherwise). If Li Moumou sued his son Ma Moumou support case, Ma Moumou proposed that he did not have the property to perform, his wife Wang also refused to agree with him to perform the joint property of the couple. It also considers that the common property of husband and wife is mainly the income of one's own work, and the judgment of the people's court does not stipulate that she has the obligation to provide for maintenance. Wang refused to enforce the grounds whether there is no reason? I believe: Wang reason is justified, at least for now. She put forward an obvious question: that the people who are obligated to provide for service as confirmed in the people's court verdict were finally executed