论文部分内容阅读
《1844年经济学哲学手稿》(下称《手稿》),对中国当代美学原理体系建构的影响,大致呈现出由整体性理论基础到批判性吸收和超越,再到内在性影响的演革。在实践美学体系中,《手稿》关于实践、“人的本质力量的对象化”“人化的自然界”和“美的规律”等命题的经典性论述,成为美学原理建构的理论基础所在。在后实践美学体系中,受对《手稿》美学思想解读差异和对实践美学批判的影响,它在美学原理建构中只是作为一个理论基点而存在。在非实践派的美学原理建构中,《手稿》的影响则是内在性地体现在学科研究对象设定等方面。当下,在文化审美实践勃兴、新兴美学体系多元发展等的冲击下,原有美学原理遭到严峻挑战。而《手稿》作为一部极具敞开性的经典文本,在新的理论维度依然具有巨大的阐释空间,可以为美学原理的重构提供新的支撑。
The 1844 Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts (hereinafter referred to as “manuscripts”) have exerted an influence on the construction of the system of the principles of contemporary Chinese aesthetics, and have generally shown the transformation from the holistic theoretical basis to the critical absorption and transcendence to the intrinsic influence. In the practical aesthetics system, the classic discussion of “manuscripts” in terms of practice, “the objectification of the essential forces of human beings”, the “naturalized human nature” and the “law of beauty” is the construction of aesthetic principles The basis of the theory. In the post-practice aesthetics system, subject to the differences in interpretation of aesthetic manuscripts and the critique of practical aesthetics, it exists only as a theoretical basis in the construction of aesthetic principles. In the construction of non-practical aesthetic principle, the influence of “manuscript” is intrinsically reflected in the subject set of subjects and so on. At present, under the impact of the flourishing of cultural aesthetic practice and the multiple development of emerging aesthetic system, the original aesthetic principles have been severely challenged. As a highly open classical text, Manuscript still has a huge space for interpretation in the new theoretical dimension, which can provide new support for the reconstruction of aesthetic principles.