论文部分内容阅读
本案是全国首例针对姓名权作出立法解释的行政诉讼案件,受到社会普遍关注,裁判结果对公安户籍登记管理的行政权、公民姓名权有重大影响。为何法律不允许任意选取“第三姓”作为姓氏?何种情况属于立法解释所规定的存在“正当理由”可以选取“第三姓”?带着这些问题,记者采访了该案的审判法官白杨。“姓氏和名字应当采用二元规制模式,这在很大程度
This case is the first administrative lawsuit case in China to make a legislative interpretation on the right of name. It has received widespread public concern. The result of the referendum has a significant impact on the administrative power and citizen’s name right of household registration administration. Why the law does not allow arbitrary selection ”third surname “ as the surname? What kind of situation belongs to the existence of the legislative interpretation ”justification “ can choose ”third surname “? With these questions, the reporter interviewed The judge of the case aspen. ”Last name and name should be used binary regulatory model, which to a large extent