论文部分内容阅读
本文通过介绍欧洲人权法院的赫托诉瑞士一案,探讨了不正当竞争规制与商业言论自由之间的关系。本文认为,不正当竞争规制与商业言论自由均具有边界上的不确定性,容易导致二者之间的冲突,由于这种不确定性在不正当竞争法框架内不可能得到有效解决,而商业言论不仅边界模糊而且仅受有限保护,因而必须超出二者的视角,寻求有效的平衡之道。欧洲人权法院在赫托案中依据《欧洲人权公约》第10条所作的裁决则为我国提供了有借鉴意义的样本。
This article discusses the relationship between unfair competition regulation and commercial freedom of speech by introducing the case of Hetuo v. Switzerland of the European Court of Human Rights. This paper argues that both the unfair competition regulation and the commercial freedom of speech have the boundary uncertainty, which easily leads to the conflict between the two. Because this kind of uncertainty can not be effectively solved within the framework of unfair competition law, commercial Not only is the rhetoric blurred and only limited protection, it is necessary to go beyond the perspective of both to seek an effective balance. The European Court of Human Rights’s ruling in accordance with Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights in the Hertha case provided our country with a sample of references.