D-二聚体及左心房前后径联合CHAn 2DSn 2-VASc评分排除非瓣膜性心房颤动患者左心房血栓的价值n

来源 :中华医学杂志 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:woxia012
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨非瓣膜性心房颤动(NVAF)患者左心房血栓的危险因素,及是否可联合D-二聚体、左心房前后径及CHAn 2DSn 2-VASc评分排除左心房血栓。n 方法:纳入2015年1月1日至2019年12月31日于北京大学人民医院行经食管超声心动图证实存在左心房血栓的75例NVAF患者为血栓组;2019年1月1日至10月31日检查无左心房血栓的80例NVAF患者为对照组。比较两组患者的临床资料、CHAn 2DSn 2-VASc评分、血液学指标和超声指标,采用多因素logistic回归模型分析与左心房血栓相关的因素。用相关因素的评分计算诊断左心房血栓的阳性预测值及阴性预测值。n 结果:两组人群的年龄、性别、持续性房颤的比例及房颤时间差异均无统计学意义(均n P>0.05),血栓组的CHAn 2DSn 2-VASc评分[n M(n Q1,n Q3)]高于对照组[2.5(1.0,3.0)比1.8(1.0,3.0),n P=0.012];凝血指标中血栓组凝血酶原活动度[n M(n Q1,n Q3)]更低[81.1%(72.0%,93.0%)比88.8%(83.0%,96.0%),n P=0.008]、活化部分凝血活酶时间[n M(n Q1,n Q3)]更长[(32.1±4.8)比(30.2±3.7)s,n P=0.006]、D-二聚体水平[n M(n Q1,n Q3)]更高[231.0(71.5,272.2)比121.7(49.0,140.0)ng/ml,n P<0.001];超声指标中血栓组左心房前后径更大[(44.6±6.6)比(38.9±5.3)mm,n P<0.001]、左室射血分数[n M(n Q1,n Q3)]更低[56.7%(45.8%,66.3%)比63.3%(60.5%,70.2%),n P=0.003]、存在二尖瓣反流的比例更高(58.1%比26.8%,n P<0.001)。与左心房内血栓形成独立相关的因素仅有左心房前后径,n OR(95%n CI)值为4.480(1.616~12.423)。联合D-二聚体、左心房前后径和CHAn 2DSn 2-VASc评分3个指标的新评分系统诊断左心房血栓的阴性预测值为100%。n 结论:在NVAF患者中,与左心房血栓形成的相关因素为左心房前后径;结合D-二聚体、左心房前后径、CHAn 2DSn 2-VASc评分可在NVAF患者消融术前进一步排除左心房血栓。n “,”Objective:To investigate the related factors of thrombosis in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), and whether the combination of D-dimer, left atrial anteroposterior diameter and CHAn 2DSn 2-VASc score can be used to exclude left atrial thrombosis.n Methods:A total of 75 NVAF patients with left atrial thrombosis confirmed by transesophageal echocardiography in Peking University People′s Hospital from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2019 were enrolled as the thrombus group. From January 1 to October 31, 2019, 80 patients with NVAF without left atrial thrombosis were enrolled as the control group. The clinical data, CHAn 2DSn 2-VASc score, hematological biomarkers, ultrasound data of two groups were compared. The independent factors associated with left atrial thrombosis were screened by univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis. The positive predictive value and negative predictive value for the diagnosis of left atrial thrombosis were gained by the score calculated based on the independent related factors.n Results:There were no significant differences in age, gender, proportion of persistent atrial fibrillation and duration of atrial fibrillation between the two groups. The CHAn 2DSn 2-VASc score [n M (n Q1, n Q3)] of the thrombus group was higher than that of the control group [2.5 (1.0, 3.0) vs 1.8 (1.0, 3.0), n P=0.012]. The prothrombin time activity [n M (n Q1, n Q3)] of the thrombus group was 81.1 (72.0, 93.0)%, which was lower than that of the control group 88.8 (83.0,96.0)% (n P=0.008). The activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) of the thrombus group was longer than that of the control group [(32.1±4.8) s vs (30.2±3.7) s, n P=0.006]. D-dimer [n M (n Q1, n Q3)] of the thrombus group was 231.0 (71.5, 272.2) ng/ml, which was higher than that of the control group 121.7 (49.0, 140.0) ng/ml (n P<0.001). The left atrial anteroposterior diameter in thrombus group was larger [(44.6±6.6) mm vs (38.9±5.3) mm,n P<0.001], the proportion of mitral regurgitation was higher (58.1% vs 26.8%,n P<0.001). The left ventricular ejection fraction [n M (n Q1, n Q3)] of the thrombus group was 56.7% (45.8%, 66.3%), which was lower than that of the control group 63.3% (60.5%, 70.2%) (n P=0.003). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the factor related to left atrial thrombosis was left atrial anteroposterior diameter (n OR=4.480, 95%n CI: 1.616-12.423). The negative predictive value of the new scoring system combined with D-dimer, left atrial anteroposterior diameter and CHAn 2DSn 2-VASc score for left atrial thrombosis was 100%.n Conclusions:In NVAF patients, the factor independently associating with left atrial thrombosis is left atrial anteroposterior diameter. The combination of D-dimer, left atrial anteroposterior diameter, and CHAn 2DSn 2-VASc score can help exclude left atrial thrombosis before ablation of NVAF.n
其他文献
目的 观察超声引导下行腰脊神经后内侧支优化阻滞复合全身麻醉在腰椎内固定术中的应用效果.方法 选取2018年12月至2020年1月于南通大学附属如皋医院择期行腰椎内固定术的患者90例,将患者随机分为静吸复合全身麻醉组45例,超声引导下腰脊神经后内侧支优化阻滞复合静吸全身麻醉组45例.记录术中舒芬太尼总用量,脑电双频指数(BIS)值,术后0、4、8、12、24 h视觉模拟评分(VAS)及术后呕吐、皮肤瘙痒、嗜睡等并发症.结果 2组术中BIS差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).超声引导下腰脊神经后内侧支优化阻滞复
目的 总结住院医师规范化培训阶段的会诊需求概况,评价教学督导会诊在住院医师规范化培训阶段的作用.方法 回顾性收集2015年8月至2017年8月间于北京协和医院超声医学科参加北京市住院医师规范化培训的住院医师43名及其于2017年11月至2018年8月申请教学督导会诊的病例,随访申请教学督导会诊的病例,总结会诊原因和部位,参照病理或临床诊断,对会诊医师作出教学评价(技术操作、定位、定性).采用χ2检验比较不同年资、不同学历住院医师申请会诊原因和部位的差异,并采用t检验比较应用教学督导会诊前、后3年以下住院医
孕妇,30岁,孕21周,孕4产2,2020年12月因既往不良生育史于湖北省妇幼保健院就诊.该孕妇既往有3次不良生育史,2017年因孕41周不明原因胎死宫内引产一女性胎儿,外观无畸形,产后发现脐带绕颈、扭转,未行尸检及其他检查.2019年,自然分娩一男婴,先证者.婴儿出生后因外生殖器偏向女性被当作女童抚养,1岁时发现外阴包块及尿道口位置异常就诊.
期刊
患者男性,64岁,因“咳嗽咳痰2个月余,发现右上肺占位3 d”入院,体格检查:呼吸18次/min,脉搏85次/min,血压125/71 mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa),体温36.9℃,气管居中,双侧颈部、锁骨上、腋窝等浅表淋巴结无肿大,双侧呼吸动度均等,右上肺叩诊浊音,呼吸音偏低,双肺呼吸音清,未闻及干湿性啰音.实验室检查:血常规显示白细胞计数为8.1×109/L,血红蛋白浓度为129 g/L,血小板计数为260×109/L;凝血酶原时间为13.8 s.胸部CT平扫+增强:右肺上叶支气管开口
期刊
患者,男性,56岁,因“间断发热2年余,再发10 d”于2020年3月入院.患者于2018年4月无明显诱因出现发热,体温最高39℃,伴畏寒、寒战,全身肌肉关节痛,遂就诊首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院,实验室检查虎红平板凝集试验呈阳性,结合症状及病史诊断为布鲁氏菌病.
期刊
先天性冠状动脉起源异常在一般人群中十分罕见,右冠状动脉异常起源于肺动脉(anomalous right coronary artery from the pulmonary artery,ARCAPA)较左冠状动脉异常起源于肺动脉(anomalous origin of the left coronary artery from the pulmonary artery, ALCAPA)则更为罕见,发病率约为0.002%[1].但同时也是最危险的先天性心脏缺陷之一,与心肌梗死、危险性心律失常、慢性心力衰竭
期刊
孕妇19岁,孕23周,既往身体健康,行常规产前超声检查.胎儿系统产前超声检查提示宫内单活胎,各项生物学指标测值在正常范围内,除怀疑永存左上腔静脉(persistent left superior vena cava,PLSVC)建议进一步行针对性胎儿超声心动图检查外,余胎儿解剖结构未见明显异常.
期刊
期刊
期刊
目的:观察健康孕妇在妊娠中晚期的胆汁酸谱变化,并建立院内参考区间。方法:选取2019年7月至2020年8月在浙江省人民医院产科进行产前检查怀有健康单胎的孕妇共298名,分别在中孕期(Tn 2)和晚孕期(Tn 3)采集早晨隔夜空腹静脉血,纳入自身对照研究组,采用液相色谱串联质谱法检测15种胆汁酸(包括胆酸、鹅脱氧胆酸、脱氧胆酸、熊脱氧胆酸、石胆酸及其甘氨酸和牛磺酸结合型)浓度,分析其妊娠中晚期的变化特征并确定其参考区间。15种胆汁酸和总胆汁酸浓度均为偏态分布数据,采用第99百分位数(n