论文部分内容阅读
最高人民法院在《关于民事诉讼证据的若干规定》中确立了举证时限制度,希望以此实现程序公正和提高诉讼效益。但举证时限制度的确立是我国司法改革前瞻的结果,一方面与上位法即现行民事诉讼法的规定相矛盾,另一方面又欠缺相应的保障机制,同时,在具体规定上又受制于大环境而不够严谨和科学。因此,在以后的立法和实务中有对举证时限制度加以完善的必要。本文试图对举证时限予以简单的分析、检讨,并提出完善我国民事诉讼举证时限制度的初步构想。
The Supreme People’s Court established the time limit of proof in “Several Provisions on Evidence in Civil Proceedings,” in the hope of realizing procedural fairness and enhancing litigation benefits. However, the establishment of the time limit of proof is the result of forward-looking judicial reform in our country. On the one hand, it contradicts with the provisions of the existing law of civil procedure, while on the other hand it lacks the corresponding security mechanism. At the same time, Not rigorous and scientific enough. Therefore, in the future legislation and practice there is a need to improve the time limit of proof. This article attempts to simply analyze and review the time limit of proof, and puts forward the tentative plan of perfecting the time limit of proof in our civil procedure.