论文部分内容阅读
韦勒克虽然并不认同卢卡奇全面否定现代主义文学的倾向,也准确地概括了其基于总体反映论的文学观,但并未找到其美学方面的“反应迟钝”与此种文学观之间的内在关联,更未洞悉到此种文学观作为其美学理据的深层诉求。实际上,卢卡奇的总体反映论所蕴含的主体中心主义和人类中心主义思想,是导致其美学评价显得单一、狭隘的主要原因,而这一情形则缘于该美学理据背后的伦理及政治诉求,即以无产阶级意识克服物化意识乃至于通过革命实践消灭物化现象;因为在哈贝马斯看来,卢卡奇犯了一个致命的错误,即再一次将实践问题理论化,最终因落入客观唯心主义的窠臼而失败。
Wellek did not agree with Lukachi’s tendency of denying modernist literature in an all-round way, and accurately summarized his view of literature based on the general theory of reflection. However, he did not find his aesthetically unresponsiveness and such a view of literature The inner relationship between them is not even more insight into this kind of literature view as its aesthetic appeal. In fact, Lukacs’s theory of subject-centered centralism and anthropocentrism are the main reasons leading to a single aesthetic evaluation, which is due to the ethical and political demands behind the aesthetics. , That is, to overcome the materialized consciousness with the proletarian consciousness and even eliminate the materialized phenomena through the revolutionary practice; for in Habermas’s opinion, Lukacs made a fatal mistake of theoretically turning the practical issue into reality Objective idealism and failure.