重“身教”并不意味着轻“言教”

• 作 者: 郑俊钦
• 机 构: 汕头市委党校,
• 出 处: 思想政治工作研究
• 发表日期: 1989年05期
• 关键词: 身教重于言教 不等于 思想政治工作 彭文 政工人员 率先垂范

彭子旭同志片面理解了“身教重于言教”这一思想政治工作优良传统的含义,以为重“身教”就意味着轻“言教”,或者导致轻“言教”。实际上,提倡“身教重于言教”,是在肯定思想政治工作必须坚持“言教”与“身教”相结合的前提下,强调教育者必须“以身作则”的意义上讲的。强调“身教重于言教”并不等于只要“身教”不要“言教”。就象马克思说过“一步实际运动要比一打纲领更重要”,并不等于马克思主张只要实际运动不要制订纲领一样。彭文将“身教”与“言教”简单对立起来,看

Comrade Peng Zixu unilaterally understood the meaning of the fine tradition of “teaching as important as precepts” in ideological and political work. He thought that “teaching” means “preaching” or “preaching.” In fact, to advocate that “teaching is more important than teaching” is to emphasize that educators must “lead by example” in affirming that ideological and political work must adhere to the combination of “preaching and teaching”. Emphasizing that “teaching is more important than teaching” does not mean that “teaching” is not “preaching”. Just as Marx said that “one step of actual exercise is more important than a dozen of programs,” it does not mean that Marx advocates that no program should be formulated in practice. Peng Wen “Pilgrims” and “preaching” simply opposite, look