论文部分内容阅读
2006年5月,一位自由撰稿人向腾讯公司投诉,他用了3年的一个QQ号近日被盗,他输入密码,总是提示密码有错,显然他的QQ已被人盗取。这位自由撰稿人很苦恼,他的这个QQ上保存着多位跟他有业务往来的编辑的资料,他的电脑24小时在线,QQ一直挂在网上,随时跟全国各地的编辑保持联系,现在QQ号被盗,损失惨重。与这位自由撰稿人有相同的不幸遭遇的网民还有很多很多。近年来,腾讯QQ被盗现象日趋严重,黑客盗窃QQ号活动非常猖撅。据悉,腾讯注册用户已达4亿左右,活跃用户为1.7亿,同时在线人数为1600万。可以说,这上亿的QQ号码是一笔庞大的虚拟财产。对于QQ号遭盗情况的总体统计,腾讯方面表示目前还无法向外提供具体数字。但业界观察者认为,在许多软件交流网站上,网民甚至可以轻松地下载到盗号软件。瑞星全球反病毒监测网透露,2005年截获的新病毒数量比2004年增长了一倍多,以盗号获取经济利益的“商业病毒”正在泛滥。分析人士指出,近年来,网络犯罪之所以日益嚣张,盗号活动猖獗不断,根本原因在于缺乏法律约束,网络监管乏力,相关法律对网络犯罪的界定也非常模糊。
In May 2006, a freelance writer complained to Tencent that he had used a QQ number of 3 years to be stolen recently. When he entered the password, he always prompts for a wrong password. Apparently his QQ has been stolen. This freelance writer is very distressed, his QQ saved on the number of editors with whom he has business information, his computer 24 hours online, QQ has been linked to the Internet at any time to keep in touch with editors across the country, QQ number now stolen, suffered heavy losses. There are many more Internet users who have the same unfortunate experience as the freelance writer. In recent years, Tencent QQ stolen phenomenon is more serious, hacking the QQ number hacking is very rampant. It is reported that Tencent registered users has reached about 400 million, 170 million active users, while the number of online 16 million. It can be said that hundreds of millions of QQ number is a huge virtual property. For the overall situation of the QQ number of theft, Tencent said it is still unable to provide specific figures. But industry watchers believe that Internet users can even easily download hacking software on many software exchange sites. Rising global anti-virus monitoring network revealed that in 2005 the number of new viruses intercepted more than doubled in 2004, to gain economic benefits from the “commercial virus ” is rampant. Analysts pointed out: In recent years, the reason why cyber criminals are increasingly arrogant and rampant activities are rampant. The fundamental reason is that there is no legal restriction and network supervision is sluggish. The definition of cybercrime by relevant laws is also very vague.