论文部分内容阅读
在西方后现代哲学和神秘主义思潮的影响下,文本阐释呈现多元、虚无的“过度阐释”倾向。但文本阐释并非没有界限,分别在认知、语义和语用三重维度上体现出意义的边界。在认知维度上,虽然语言具有创造性,但人们会集体式、不自觉基于语言经济原则进行阐释,因此至少在一些关键信息上存在认知趋同。在语义维度上,理念意义允许无限的个别意义,但仍然规定了这些个别阐释的界限,界限之外的阐释为过度阐释。在语用维度上,可能的阐释是无数的,但人们接受的阐释却是一个或数个,阐释的有效性必须接受语言交往共同体的检验。在上述维度观照下,文本阐释空间体现了界限下的创造与约束。
Under the influence of Western postmodernist philosophy and mysticism, the textual interpretation presents a pluralistic and void “over-interpretation” tendency. However, there is no limit to the textual interpretation, which implies the boundary of meaning in cognitive, semantic and pragmatic dimensions respectively. In the cognitive dimension, although the language is creative, people interpret themselves collectively and unconsciously based on the principles of linguistic economy. Therefore, there is cognitive convergence at least in some key messages. In the semantic dimension, the meaning of the idea allows unlimited individual meanings, but it still lays down the boundaries of these individual interpretations and the interpretations beyond the boundaries as overexposed. In the pragmatic dimension, the possible explanations are innumerable, but the interpretations that people accept are one or a few. The validity of interpretation must be tested by the community of linguistic intercourse. Under the above dimensions, the space for interpreting text embodies the creation and restraint in the limit.