论文部分内容阅读
目的比较常规治疗与常规治疗加辅助高压氧治疗的颅脑创伤患者各项临床治疗效果。方法选取颅脑创伤患者60例,随机均分为观察组和对照组,对照组行常规治疗,观察组在对照组治疗的基础上行高压氧治疗。将两组治疗后的残疾分级量表(DRS)与GCS评分、总有效率进行对比。结果观察组患者治疗后的DRS(11.23±3.18)分与GCS(13.19±3.06)分优于对照组患者DRS(15.07±2.19)分与GCS(8.28±4.45)分,观察组患者的总有效率高于对照组(90.00%vs.66.67%),观察组患者并发症发生率低于对照组(6.67%vs.30.00%)(P<0.05)。结论常规治疗的颅脑创伤患者辅助高压氧治疗具有良好的临床效果。
Objective To compare the clinical curative effects of traumatic brain injury patients treated with routine therapy and conventional therapy plus hyperbaric oxygen therapy. Methods Sixty patients with traumatic brain injury were randomly divided into observation group and control group. The control group received routine treatment. The observation group received hyperbaric oxygen therapy based on the control group. The two groups after treatment disability grading scale (DRS) and GCS score, the total effective rate was compared. Results The total effective rate of DRS (11.23 ± 3.18) and GCS (13.19 ± 3.06) in the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group (15.07 ± 2.19) and GCS (8.28 ± 4.45) (90.00% vs.66.67%). The complication rate in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (6.67% vs.30.00%, P <0.05). Conclusion Conventional treatment of traumatic brain injury patients with hyperbaric oxygen therapy has a good clinical effect.