论文部分内容阅读
2011年中科院院士增选初步候选人名单公布后,北京大学生命科学院院长饶毅落选。饶毅称早已预计到结果并表示不再参选院士。网友称饶毅落选是院士制度的悲哀。饶毅曾撰文质疑中国中长期科技规划,也曾批评科学界浮躁、教授搞关系拉经费不搞学术等问题。比起“工程管理学院士候选人近半来自国企高管和政府官员”的新闻,以饶毅为代表的纯学术人才的落选,更能激起网络上的热议。综合看来,当前院士评选制度的堕落已经病入膏肓。其一,“仕而优则院士”
After the publication of the list of preliminary candidates for the addition of Chinese Academy of Sciences in 2011, Rao Yi, dean of the Peking University Life Science Institute, was unsuccessful. Rao Yi said it had already expected results and said no longer run for academicians. User said Rao Yi loses election is the sorrow of the academician system. Rao Yi has questioned China's long-term science and technology planning, has also criticized the impetuous scientific community, professors engaged in pulling relations do not engage in academic and other issues. Compared with the news that “nearly half of academic candidates for engineering management come from state-owned enterprise executives and government officials,” the unsuccessful election of purely academic personnel represented by Rao Yi can arouse heated discussion on the Internet. In summary, the current fall of the academician appraisal system has become ill. First, “Shi Youyou Academy of Sciences ”