论文部分内容阅读
长期以来,经济理论界的很多同志,把社会必要劳动时间区分为两种不同含义的社会必要劳动时间,认定为两个不同的概念,并从这一点出发,来说明两种含义的社会必要劳动时间在价值决定中的地位和作用,从而形成不同的意见。这些观点都是值得商榷的。实际上,马克思在《资本论》中阐明的是一个完整的社会必要劳动时间的概念,没有所谓两种含义的社会必要劳动时间的概念;商品的价值,就是由这个完整的社会必要劳动时间决定的,而不是由两种含义的社会必要劳动时间共同决定,或由其中一种含义的社会必要劳动时间单独决定的。
For a long time, many comrades in the economic theory field have identified two different concepts as the socially necessary working time that divides the socially necessary working time into two different meanings. From this point of view, we will illustrate the socially necessary labor with two meanings The position and role of time in the value determination lead to different opinions. These views are debatable. In fact, Marx's “capital theory” illustrates the concept of a complete socially necessary working time, and there is no concept of so-called two meanings of socially necessary working time; the value of a commodity is determined by this complete socially necessary working time Rather than by the two meanings of socially necessary working hours, or by one of the meanings of socially necessary working hours alone.