论文部分内容阅读
上世纪中国文论经历了断根之痛,文论传统如何承继成为一个重要的时代课题。西方文论及哲学思想的渗入并形成愈来愈大的影响,使文论传统问题复杂化。新世纪以来,随着中国学术界在世界交流中主体意识的增强,构成主体性根基的传统问题更成为重要的学术课题。本论文从分析中国文论传统、重估传统价值的角度,通过中西比较,指认中国文论传统的独特性集中体现为把有机整体性的保存与实现当作文论务求的境界与标准,坚持物我相融传统理性的特色鲜明的文论主张,以及探究生存流变过程、注重生存流变关系的文论范畴系统。在此基础上,论文对中国文论传统的当下形态进行阐释,认为继承文论传统主要不在于传统显性形态的转用或因袭,而在于传统理性精神的坚持与发扬,包括有机整体性的生存意识,与万物为一的精神境界,顺时求变的实践观念等。这是中国文论主体性所在,也是中国文论的时代特征所在。
Chinese literary theory in the last century has experienced the pain of breaking roots and how to inherit the tradition of literary theory has become an important topic of the times. The infiltration of Western literary theory and philosophical thinking and the formation of a growing influence make the traditional issues of literary theory complicated. Since the beginning of the new century, with the increase of the awareness of the subject among Chinese academics in the world exchange, the traditional issues that form the foundation of subjectivity have become important academic topics. From the point of analyzing the tradition of Chinese literary tradition and revaluating the traditional value, this thesis, through the comparison of Chinese and Western traditions, points out that the uniqueness of Chinese traditional literary tradition embodies the realm of preserving and realizing organic wholeness as the realm and standard of literary theory, I blend traditional rational distinctive features of literary theory, as well as explore the rheological process of survival, focusing on the rheological relationship between literary theory categories system. On the basis of this, the essay expounds the present form of Chinese literary tradition, and holds that the inheritance of traditional literary theory is not mainly the conversion or tracing of the traditional dominant form, but the persistence and development of the traditional rational spirit, including the organic wholeness Survival consciousness, the spiritual realm with all things, the practice idea of changing in time and so on. This is where the subjectivity of Chinese literary theory lies, as well as the epoch of Chinese literary theory.