论文部分内容阅读
5月7日,25岁的河南新乡小伙王超杰在青海打工时,突遇工友落水,为了救出东北工友,王超杰不幸落水牺牲,一同救人牺牲的还有一名东北工人。让王超杰家人不解的是,那名东北工人因是城市户口,所以施工方赔偿40多万,而王超杰是农村户口,根据农民收入来核算,只能赔偿19万多。两者的赔偿数额相差高达21万。我认为,城乡二元体制下因为户籍差别导致的“同命不同价”问题,是对社会公平的极大伤害。与以前相比,现在执行的规定:农村户口的受害者,已在城镇居住一年以上的,可以适用城镇赔偿标准。这无疑是一个进步。但是,这一规定虽然提高了进城农民的赔偿标准,但是,就本质而言,它依旧坚持城乡两种赔偿标准,依旧认可城乡居民生命价值在司法赔偿实践
On May 7, 25-year-old Henan Wangxiang Wang, a guy in Xinxiang, who worked hard in Qinghai Province, suddenly encountered a worker and fell into the water. In order to rescuing workers in the Northeast, Wang Chaotui unfortunately died at the expense of sacrificing water and sacrificed one with a northeast worker. To Wang Chaojie family members puzzled that the northeast workers because of urban hukou, so the construction side compensation for more than 40 million, while Wang Chaodeng is a rural account, according to the income of farmers to account, only to compensate more than 190,000. The difference between the two amounts up to 210,000. In my opinion, the issue of “same life with different prices” caused by the difference of household registration under the urban-rural dual system is a great harm to social fairness. Compared with the previous implementation of the provisions: the victims of rural hukou, have lived in cities and towns more than one year, the urban compensation standards can be applied. This is undoubtedly a progress. However, this provision has raised the standard of compensation for peasants entering cities. However, in essence, it still adheres to the two kinds of compensation standards for urban and rural areas. It still recognizes the value of life for both urban and rural residents in the judicial compensation practice