论文部分内容阅读
中国的社会史与学术史研究在许多方面可相互补充,这种跨越给中国学术思想史研究注入了新的动力,产生了一系列的重要学术成果,这种方法俨然成为中国学术思想史研究的一种研究范式。笔者将以此范式作为方法论的指导,从地域、家族与学派的关系这一独具社会史意味的视角,对宋明时期江西朱子后学群体研究进行概说,关注的是地域、家族因素在朱子后学群体形成中的动态作用,揭示的是各学派内部构造与地域结构的关系及江西朱子后学群体与其他学派或其他地区的学术力量在思想及学术方法上相互促进的图景,以期对朱子学的流衍作新的诠释。
The study of social history and academic history in China can complement each other in many aspects. This kind of leap forwards a new impetus to the study of the history of Chinese academic thought and produces a series of important academic achievements. This approach has become the study of the history of Chinese academic thought A research paradigm. The author takes this paradigm as the guideline of methodology. From the perspective of the unique social history meaning of the relationship between regions, clans and schools, this essay summarizes the research on the postmodernist group in Jiangxi in the Song and Ming Dynasties, focusing on the geographical and familial factors The dynamic role of Zhu Xi’s post-school group formation reveals the relationship between the internal structure and geographical structure of each school and the mutual promotion of academic strength between post-Zhu Xi group and other schools or other areas in Jiangxi in ideological and academic ways. Zhu Xi flow as a new interpretation.