论文部分内容阅读
孩子最终是要走向社会的,让他们有准备地去还是无准备地去,这个问题也许不难回答。在上一期这篇讨论的开头,国秀华老师曾经提到过一个被两个保姆带大的孩子。由于照顾过周,这个孩子的生活能力以及基本的与人交往能力,也就是他的社会性就没有得到适当的培养。由于不敢也不会与同伴交往,这个孩子失去了许多锻炼机会,因而阻碍了他的进一步发展。因为,生活能力强的孩子,事情做得好,干得快,经常受到老师的表扬和小朋友的爱戴,他自己也更加乐观自信;而生活能力差的孩子难得受到表扬,
It may not be hard to answer the question whether children should ultimately go socially and let them go preparedly or unprepared. At the beginning of this discussion in the previous issue, Teacher Guo Xiuhua once mentioned a kid who was taken up by two nannies. Because of taking care of Zhou, this child’s living ability and basic ability to interact with others, that is, his social nature has not been properly cultivated. Because he did not dare to interact with his peers, he lost many opportunities for exercise and thus hindered his further development. Because, children with strong ability to do well, doing well, doing fast, often by the teacher’s compliments and children’s love, he is also more optimistic and confident; and poor living children rare praise,