论文部分内容阅读
在其他项目上均占优势的XR-V在舒适性上表现出了不足,ix25则在这一项目上扳回一城。GS4因其变速箱顿挫问题,将它偏软的悬架带来的优势拉低了。而在油耗表现上,XR-V最省油,GS4和ix25油耗偏高。XR-V避震性能最差GS4悬架偏软较舒适XR-V的避震性能最差这一表现,得到了CCR独立车评团队三名测试者的一致认可。为了得到更好的运动体验,设计师将XR-V的悬挂设计得
The XR-V, which excels in all other projects, shows a lack of comfort, and the ix25 regains the spotlight on this project. Because of its gearbox frustration, the GS4 pulled its softer suspension down. In the performance of fuel consumption, XR-V most fuel-efficient, GS4 and ix25 fuel consumption is high. XR-V Shock Absorption GS4 Suspension Softer Comfort The XR-V’s worst-case shock absorbing performance was unanimously endorsed by three testers from the CCR Independent Car Assessment team. In order to get a better sports experience, designer XR-V suspension design too