论文部分内容阅读
《三字经》作者和版本问题是历史公案,悬而未决。近年来,广东顺德启动“三字经”申报国家非遗项目,浙江将“三字经”列为省第二批非物质文化遗产名录,更助推了这一学术论争。笔者近读各位学者的论述,提出疑问和推测,以就教于方家。2004年李良品在《社会科学家》第5期上发表了《<三字经>的成书过程与作者归属考略》一文,认为《三字经》的作者是区适子(1234—1324)而非王应麟(1223—1296)。他提出的前三个理由均与《三字经》的内容有关,而笔者认为这三个理
“Three Character Classic” author and version problem is a historical case, pending. In recent years, Shunde, Guangdong Province, started the “Three Character Classic” to declare the national non-heritage items. Zhejiang listed the “Three Character Classic” as the second batch of non-material cultural heritage list of the province, further boosting this academic controversy. I read the scholars’ expositions, put forward questions and speculation, to teach Yufangjia. In 2004, Li Liangpin published an article entitled “A Study on the Process of Writing a Book of Three Stylites” and “Attribution of Authors” in the fifth issue of Social Scientists. He believed that the author of “Three Character Classic” was Wushu District (1234-1324) rather than Wang Yinglin (1223 -1296). The first three reasons he put forward are all related to the contents of the Three Character Classic. However, I think these three theories