论文部分内容阅读
不同的政府绩效评估机制,关联不同的发展模式和发展结果。重经济绩效轻社会绩效的发展模式,与以往的政府绩效评估实践中存在主客体模糊甚至错位、评估主体过分单一、评估的规范化程度不高、公众参与程度低、评估内容不全面、评估指标体系权重设置不合理等评估机制密切相关。落实科学发展观,必须创新政府绩效评估理念、评估标准、建立评估主体“多元化”的评估机制、提高公民参与评估的能力和参与程度、制定政府绩效评估的法律法规、以程序规则为支撑、引进和完善听证原则等。科学的政府绩效评估机制是促使理论与实践相结合的重要的实践维度。
Different government performance evaluation mechanisms, linking different development models and development outcomes. Heavy economic performance light social performance development model, and the past performance evaluation of government there are obscure the main object and the object, the assessment of the subject is too simple, the assessment of the standardization is not high, the public participation is low, the assessment is not comprehensive, the evaluation index system The unreasonable weight setting and other assessment mechanisms are closely related. To implement the scientific concept of development, we must innovate the concept of government performance evaluation, evaluate the standards, establish an assessment mechanism of assessment subject “diversification ”, enhance citizens’ capability and participation in assessment, formulate laws and regulations of government performance evaluation, Support, introduce and improve the hearing principles. Scientific government performance evaluation mechanism is to promote the combination of theory and practice an important dimension of practice.