论文部分内容阅读
合同无效或被撤销后,要发生返还财产、缔约过失责任、行政处罚的法律后果。对于返还财产的性质,即给付人是基于所有物返还请求权还是不当得利返还请求权要求受领人返还财产,理论界争议颇多,而这与是否承认物权行为无因性理论有直接关系。本文探讨了两种返还请求权的区别与联系,认为承认二者的竞合可以更好的保护给付人的利益。出于利益均衡的考虑,笔者主张应对返还请求权予以合理限制。
After the contract is invalid or has been revoked, the legal consequences of returning property, contracting negligence and administrative punishment will occur. The nature of the return of property, that is, the payer is based on the return of the property claims or unjust enrichment claims the recipient to return the property, the controversial lot of theorists, and whether to recognize the non-sexual property rights theory there is direct relationship. This article explores the differences and relations between the two types of restitution claims, recognizing that the two competing can better protect the interests of payers. For the sake of balancing interests, the author advocates that the right of return should be rationally restricted.