论文部分内容阅读
医疗纠纷问题已经成为我们日益关注的焦点之一,医疗侵权中举证责任直接关乎着医方与患方的利益分配问题。如何科学合理的分配证明责任将会对诉讼结果产生不一样的效果。因此,从举证责任角度来研究医疗侵权有其必要性和重要性。《侵权责任法》的出台是立法上的进步,然而关于医疗侵权举证责任的规定还是过于笼统。例如《侵权责任法》第58条第一款对推定过错的情形规定的过于简单、难于操作;在因果关系的举证上原告遇到的尴尬;会诊制度规定出现漏洞等。本文针对不足一一提出了完善建议,以期待医疗侵权举证责任在实现正义和维护医患双方平衡利益方面发挥更好的作用。
The issue of medical disputes has become one of the focuses that we are paying more and more attention to. The burden of proof in medical tortures is directly related to the distribution of benefits between the medical authorities and patients. How to distribute the burden of proof rationally and rationally will have a different effect on the litigation result. Therefore, it is necessary and important to study medical tort from the perspective of burden of proof. The introduction of “Tort Liability Act” is a legislative progress, however, the provisions on the burden of proof for medical tort liability are still too general. For example, Article 58 (1) of the Tort Liability Act prescribes too simple and difficult to operate in the presumption of fault; the embarrassment the plaintiff encountered in the proof of causation; and the consultation system stipulates loopholes. In this paper, we put forward perfect suggestions for the shortcomings, expecting that the burden of proof of medical tort should play a better role in realizing justice and safeguarding the interests of doctors and patients.