论文部分内容阅读
于新国同志在《图书馆学研究》1990年第3期上发表了题为《谈以 ISBN 作为标准书次号》一文,笔者阅后颇有一些不同看法,现提出来与于新国同志商榷。于文中提到,“一种优良的书次号,应当同时具有独立性、稳定性、简易性特征,要便于工作,更要便于各馆统一。……实现标准化。我认为 ISBN 基本上具备以上要求。”笔者认为,书次号是为使同类书排序个别化而用的区分号,它必须取之于实践,用之于实践,只有经得起实践检验的、确实具备“标准”条件的书次号,才能作为标准书次号。就 ISBN 而言,它一书一号,独立性强,这是大家所公认的,但作为标准书次号所产生的一系列的实际问题,也是不可忽视的。
Comrade Yu Xin-guo published a paper titled “Numbering ISBN as a Standard Book” on “Library Science Research”, No. 3, 1990, and there are quite a few different opinions after the author read it. Now he proposes to discuss with Comrade Xin Xing-guo . As mentioned in the article, “An excellent book number should have the characteristics of independence, stability and simplicity at the same time, be easy to work for, and be more uniform among different museums .... To achieve standardization, I think ISBN basically meets the above requirements . ”The author believes that the secondary number is a distinguishing number used to individualize similar books. It must be put into practice and used in practice. Only those books that can withstand the test of practice and do have“ standard ”conditions , Can be used as a standard book number. In the case of ISBN, its first book, which is highly independent, is universally acknowledged. However, it can not be ignored as a series of practical problems arising from the standard book number.