论文部分内容阅读
以大众图书为主的出版单位可以更多考虑市场效益和社会效益,但如果评价社科出版机构,我认为更多应从学术影响力角度出发。过去很长一段时间,业界和读者对社科出版的评价常常是“跟着感觉走”。不过,2011年,当南京大学信息管理学院教授苏新宁和其团队的研究成果《中国人文社会科学图书学术影响力报告》(以下简称报告)由中国社会科学出版社出版后,对于社科图书的学术影响力评价终于不再“口说无凭”了。
Publishing units based on mass books can give more consideration to market and social benefits. However, if we evaluate social science publishing institutions, I think more should be done from an academic perspective. For a long time in the past, the evaluation of social science publishing by the industry and its readers was often “followed by feeling”. However, in 2011, when Academician Su Xinning of Nanjing University School of Information Management and his team’s research report Academic Humanities and Social Sciences Academic Impact Report (hereinafter referred to as the report) published by the China Social Sciences Publishing House, the social science books academic Influence evaluation finally no longer “no say ”.