论文部分内容阅读
目的:探究中西医综合措施在预防重型颅脑损伤患者术后并发症中的作用,为临床上患者的治疗提供借鉴。方法:随机选择在2011年8月—2014年10月到医院进行治疗的重型颅脑损伤患者共86例作为本次研究对象,根据患者治疗方式的不同将患者分为对照组43例与观察组43例,观察组患者采用中西医综合措施进行治疗,对照组患者采用西医进行治疗,观察两组患者术后治疗情况,分析中西医综合措施在预防重型颅脑患者术后并发症中的作用。结果:观察组患者中出现肺部感染的为2例,出现消化道出血的为4例,出现颅内血肿的为1例,出现高血糖的为5例,而对照组患者中出现肺部感染的为8例,出现消化道出血的为11例,出现颅内血肿的为7例,出现高血糖的为13例,观察组患者并发症发生情况与对照组比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),观察组患者经过治疗后治疗效果显著的为22例,治疗有效的为17例,治疗无效的为4例,而对照组患者中治疗效果显著的为10例,治疗有效的为24例,治疗无效的为9例,观察组患者治疗效果与对照组比较差异具有统计学意义(U=1.938 5,P=0.032 6),并且观察组患者经过治疗后的满意程度与对照组比较差异具有统计学意义(U=2.505 2,P=0.012 2),观察组患者经过治疗后,实验室各项指标检测与对照组比较具有显著差异(P<0.05)。结论:中西医综合措施在对重型颅脑损伤患者的治疗效果良好,患者在经过治疗后出现并发症的情况明显降低。
Objective: To explore the integrated Chinese and Western medicine in the prevention of severe craniocerebral injury in patients with postoperative complications and provide a reference for the treatment of patients with clinical. Methods: A total of 86 patients with severe craniocerebral injury who were admitted to the hospital from August 2011 to October 2014 were randomly selected as the study object. According to the different treatment methods, 43 patients were divided into control group and observation group 43 cases. The observation group was treated with integrated traditional and western medicine. The control group was treated with western medicine. The postoperative treatment of the two groups was observed. The effect of integrated traditional Chinese and western medicine in preventing postoperative complications of severe craniocerebral injury was analyzed. Results: In the observation group, there were 2 cases of pulmonary infection, 4 cases of gastrointestinal bleeding, 1 case of intracranial hematoma, 5 cases of hyperglycemia, and pulmonary infection in the control group Of the 8 cases, 11 cases of gastrointestinal bleeding, intracranial hematoma in 7 cases, hyperglycemia in 13 cases, the observation group patients with complications compared with the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). In the observation group, there were 22 cases after treatment, the effective treatment was 17 cases, the treatment was ineffective for 4 cases, while the control group, the treatment effect was significantly 10 cases, the effective treatment was 24 cases , The treatment was ineffective in 9 cases, the observation group patients with treatment effect compared with the control group, the difference was statistically significant (U = 1.938 5, P = 0.032 6), and the observation group patients after treatment satisfaction compared with the control group has Statistical significance (U = 2.505 2, P = 0.012 2). After treatment in the observation group, there was a significant difference (P <0.05) between the laboratory indexes and the control group. Conclusion: The comprehensive measures of TCM and WM are effective in treating patients with severe traumatic brain injury, and the patients’ complications after treatment are significantly reduced.