论文部分内容阅读
文章概述了学界关于检察权性质的行政权说、司法权说、混合说及法律监督权说,对这四种学说的研究进路进行了理论批判,然后在三权分立模式下对检察权性质进行了总结反思,最后在中国的宪政体制下对检察权的性质进行一种探索性的学理解释,并回应了这种研究路径可能引致的质疑和批判,指出了法律监督权说的理论纰漏,认为我国检察权实为一种新型的与行政权、审判权并存的国家权力。我国检察权具有法律监督的功能,但不应定位为法律监督权。
The article summarizes the academic power on the prosecutorial nature of the executive said that the judicial power to say that the right to supervise and supervise the theory of the four theories of theoretical criticism, and then the separation of powers in the right to prosecutorial nature In the end, this article makes an exploratory theoretical explanation of the nature of prosecutorial power in China’s constitutional system and responds to the questions and criticisms that this research path may cause. It also points out the theoretical flaws in the legal supervision power, We think the procuratorial power of our country is actually a new type of state power coexisting with the executive power and judicial power. The procuratorial power in our country has the function of legal supervision, but should not be the legal supervision power.