论文部分内容阅读
立法语言的技术风格反映的是特定国家或地区的政治法律制度特色、历史文化传统和价值理念,而不仅仅是一个方法或技术问题。当今世界资本主义两大法系的立法语言风格的差别在于,大陆法系的立法属于概括的模糊型立法,而普通法系的立法则属于具体的繁琐型立法。这两种立法语言风格,对于民主法治事业而言,各具利弊得失。各国在对立法语言的技术风格进行选择时,应立足国情,综合考虑各个方面的因素,尤其是法治水平、所立法律的性质和该法律所要调整的人群的类别等,以便制定出适宜本民族特点的、具有可操作性和科学性的立法。
The technical style of the legislative language reflects the characteristics of political and legal systems, historical and cultural traditions and values in a particular country or region, not just a methodological or technical issue. The difference between the legislative language styles of the two legal systems in today’s world capitalism lies in the fact that the legislation of the civil law system is generalized fuzzy type of legislation whereas the common law type of legislation belongs to the specific cumbersome type of legislation. Both of these legislative language styles have their own pros and cons for the cause of democracy and the rule of law. When selecting the technical style of the legislative language, all countries should consider various factors, in particular, the level of the rule of law, the nature of the law to be legislated and the categories of people to be adjusted by the law, so as to formulate suitable nationalities Features, operational and scientific legislation.