论文部分内容阅读
《刘子》作者是谁,学界一直有不同说法。林其锬、陈凤金先生《刘子作者考辨》发表后产生了一定影响,是《刘子》刘勰说的具有代表性的观点。本文根据林、陈二先生文章发表后刘昼说的再质疑,并结合刘勰公认的所有著作和刘昼生平及《刘子》一书的内容,尤其把刘勰及其著作放到六朝玄学思潮大背景下综合考虑,从七个方面对《刘子作者考辨》予以补证,进一步辩驳刘昼说的论据,并试图厘清《刘子》作者由是刘勰到怀疑刘勰,再到否定刘勰的过程,还刘勰一个公道,主张把《刘子》的著作权还给刘勰。
Who is the author of “Liu”? The academic circles have always had different opinions. Lin Qifan and Mr. Chen Fengjin had some influence after the publication of Liu Authors’ Examination, which is the representative view of “Liu Zi” Liu said. This article based on the remarks of Liu Day after the publication of Lin and Chen Er’s articles, and combined with all the works recognized by Liu Xie and the contents of Liu Dayheng’s life and Liu Zi, especially Liu Xie and his writings in the Six Dynasties metaphysics Under the background, we consider the argument of Liu Authors from seven aspects, further argue the argument of Liu Day’s speech and try to clarify the process that the author of Liu is from Liu Xie to Liu Xie and then to Liu Xie , But also Liu Yi a fair, advocated the “Liu” copyright back to Liu Yi.