论文部分内容阅读
近年来,随着教育多元化的不断发展,教师评价主体从单极化向多元化转变,评价方式由少数人的“印象化”向重在过程与信息记录的“档案化”转变。与之相对应的是,一批独立于教师人事档案之外,与教师职业有关的教学档案、育人档案、科研档案、名师档案以及廉洁从教档案等,如雨后春笋般生成开来。此类档案蓬勃发展的态势,反映了教师评价手段的民主化、信息化和实证化。但同时,此类档案在建立与管理过程中目的的功利化、标准的随意化和管理的无序化等问题不容忽视。
In recent years, with the continuous development of education diversification, the main body of teacher evaluation has changed from unipolarity to pluralism, and the evaluation method has been changed from the “impression” of the minority to the “archivalization” of the process and information recording. change. Correspondingly, a group of teaching files, educational records, scientific research archives, teacher archives, and honest records from teachers other than teachers' personnel files have been mushroomed. The vigorous development of such archives reflects the democratization, informatization and demonstration of teachers' evaluation methods. However, at the same time, problems such as utilitarianization, randomization of standards and disorder of management in the process of establishment and management of such archives can not be ignored.