论文部分内容阅读
一场并不复杂的不动产抵押借款,却让出借人的千万元资产有去无回。“一物二押”的窘境是如何变成现实的?相关行政、司法部门又在此案中扮演了什么角色?这是一次长达4年且关乎财产权利的“长跑”。只不过,这样的一次长跑至今无法让当事人看到终点线。维权之路上的奔跑者是一位古稀之年的美籍华人,名叫龚耀金,现年72岁。他执拗地想给自己讨个说法。最近,龚耀金的身影出现在了北京某法学研讨会上,他向国内诸多知名法学专家、律师讲述了自己
An uncomplicated real estate mortgage loan, leaving the lender’s ten million yuan assets have gone back. How does the dilemma of “one thing, two charges” become a reality? And what role does the relevant administrative and judicial department play in this case? This is a “long-distance running” for 4 years involving property rights. However, such a long run so far can not let the parties see the finish line. The runner on the road to rights protection is an ancient Chinese nationality named Gong Yaojin, aged 72. He stubbornly wanted to give himself a discussion. Recently, Gong Yaojin figure appeared in a law seminar in Beijing, he told many well-known legal experts and lawyers about himself