论文部分内容阅读
目的:观察牙周消口服液辅助牙周基础治疗对侵袭性牙周炎(胃火上炎型)的疗效。方法:选取符合诊断标准的侵袭性牙周炎(Ag P)患者60例为研究对象,随机分为治疗组和对照组,每组30例,对照组接受牙周基础治疗,治疗组患者在对照组的基础上联合牙周消口服液治疗。结果:治疗6周后,治疗组临床总有效率为93.3%,对照组临床总有效率为80.0%,治疗组优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后2、4、6个月的患牙PD、CAL、BI较治疗前均有改善,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),且时间越长越明显,患者的PD、CAL、BI改善越明显(P<0.05);两组患者在治疗后的2、4、6个月的患牙牙齿松动度较治疗前均有改善,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),且时间越长改善越明显(P<0.05)。结论:牙周消口服液辅助牙周基础治疗胃火上炎型侵袭性牙周炎有较好的疗效。
Objective: To observe the effect of periodontal oral solution assisted periodontal treatment on invasive periodontitis (Stomach Fire). Methods: Sixty patients with aggressive periodontitis (Ag P) were enrolled in the study. They were randomly divided into treatment group and control group, 30 cases in each group. The control group received basic periodontal treatment. In the control group, Group based on the combination of periodontal oral solution treatment. Results: After 6 weeks of treatment, the total clinical effective rate was 93.3% in the treatment group and 80.0% in the control group. The treatment group was superior to the control group with statistically significant difference (P <0.05). The PD, CAL and BI in the affected teeth at 2, 4, and 6 months after treatment were significantly improved compared with those before treatment (P <0.05), and the longer the time, the more obvious the PD, CAL, BI (P0.05) .There was no significant difference between the two groups in the tooth mobility at 2,4,6 months after treatment (P <0.05), and the time The longer the improvement, the more obvious (P <0.05). Conclusion: Periodontal oral solution assisted periodontal treatment of Stomach fire on inflammatory type periodontitis have better curative effect.