论文部分内容阅读
1 前言 不论在专业棋手的比赛,或是在业余棋手的比赛中,近几年围棋竞赛采用积分编排制方法,越来越多了。积分编排制以其赛程短、节省经费等主要特点,受到主办单位和选手的一致欢迎。但在长期实践中,我们也发现该方法有以下缺陷: 第一,积分编排制不宜采用双轮次数。国家体委颁布的1988年围棋竞赛规则中确定,积分编排制的轮次数一般为单淘汰制所需轮次数的一倍(即双数轮次)。但我们在实际操作中发现,如进行双数轮次比赛,则经常出现多先、少先的情况。例如在10轮制积分循环赛中,很可能出现几个选手6先4后或6后4先的现象。
1 Foreword Whether in the professional game player, or amateur chess players in recent years, go game competition using integral arrangement method, more and more. The integral arrangement with its short schedule, save money and other major features, by the unanimous welcome of the organizers and players. However, in the long-term practice, we also find that this method has the following defects: First, it is not appropriate to adopt double rounds for the integral arrangement. The rules of the 1988 Go Competition promulgated by the State Sports Commission have determined that the number of rounds of the points arrangement is generally double the number of rounds (ie double rounds) required for a single elimination system. However, we have found in practice that in the case of double-digit rounds, there are often more first-than-fewer-precedent situations. For example, in the 10-round points round robin, it is likely that several players 6 after 4 or 6 after 4 first phenomenon.