论文部分内容阅读
集体土地所有权主体形式中“集体”的内涵并不是一项孤立的制度安排,而是与集体土地所有权的性质结为一体的。集体土地所有权主体制度改革存在实行集体土地国有化、实行集体土地私有化以及集体土地所有权是否保留等争论。集体土地所有权主体的重构可概括为法人制改造与非法人制改造两种方案,但这些理论探索仍存在研究视野偏狭、研究方法单一、研究成果疏于体系思维和法律构造脱离特定的时空背景等问题。
The connotation of the “collective” in the main form of collective land ownership is not an isolated institutional arrangement, but is integrated with the nature of collective land ownership. The main body of the reform of the ownership of collective land ownership exists the implementation of the nationalization of collective land, the implementation of privatization of collective land and the ownership of collective land whether the reservation or not. The reconstruction of the main body of the collective land ownership can be summarized as the legal person system reform and the unlawful person system reform two kinds of plan, but these theories exploration still exists the research field is narrow, the research method is single, the research result lacks in the system thinking and the legal structure from the special spatiotemporal background And other issues.