论文部分内容阅读
我国各次修订的《刑法》中都将“谋取不正当利益”作为行贿罪判定的必备条件,但其在主动行贿和被动行贿中所处的地位和作用不尽相同;根据司法实践经验,“谋取不正当利益”是主动行贿行为的主观要件,是被动行贿行为的客观要件;由此给司法实践带来了一定的困难,并引起了学术界刑法领域学者及司法机关内部关于其去留问题的讨论。在笔者看来,应区分主动行贿还是被动行贿采取不同的立场,在主动行贿中不应将“谋取不正当利益”作为必备条件。
All the amended “Criminal Law” in our country regard “seeking unjust interests” as a prerequisite for the determination of bribery, but their positions and roles in active bribery and passive bribery are different. According to judicial practice Experience, “seeking illegitimate interests ” is a subjective element of active bribery and an objective element of passive bribery. This has brought certain difficulties to judicial practice and has caused scholars within the academic field of criminal law and the judiciary Discussion of the question of whether to go or not. In my opinion, should take the initiative to bribe or passive bribery take different positions in the active bribery should not “seek unjust interests ” as a prerequisite.