论文部分内容阅读
目的:研究分析老年心肌梗死患者恢复期的临床护理,为后期的老年心肌梗死患者恢复期护理工作实施提供相应的借鉴。方法:选择2014年12月—2015年12月在我院接受治疗的120例老年恢复期心肌梗死患者作为主要的研究对象,回顾性分析患者的临床资料,对其进行随机分组,平分为参照组跟观察组,分别给予常规护理和恢复期个性化护理干预,使用抑郁自评量表、焦虑自评量表、生存质量调查问卷对两组患者的护理效果对比分析。结果:参照组干预之后的SAS评分以及SDS评分相比观察组干预之后改善程度较低,两者之间差异具有非常显著的现实意义,具有显著统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组患者的人生存质量平均评分为(58.14±11.20)分,参照组患者的人生存质量平均评分为(87.95±28.66)分,两组患者的人生存质量平均评分差异显著,具有明显的统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者总满意度相比,观察组护理满意度为100%,比参照组约高17.00%。比较两组数据,差距显著(χ2=17.2896,P<0.05),有统计学意义。结论:给予老年心肌梗死患者恢复期个性化护理干预可促进治疗效果得到有效提高,可以提升老年心肌梗死患者的生存质量,同时还可以促使并发症发生率明显降低,促使患者心理状态实现进一步改善,可以进一步分析使用。
Objective: To study and analyze the clinical nursing of convalescent elderly patients with myocardial infarction, and to provide reference for the implementation of nursing work in convalescent elderly patients with myocardial infarction. Methods: 120 elderly patients with convalescent myocardial infarction treated in our hospital from December 2014 to December 2015 were selected as the main study subjects. The clinical data of patients were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were randomly divided into two groups: reference group With the observation group were given routine care and recovery of personalized care intervention, the use of self-rating depression scale, self-rating anxiety scale, quality of life questionnaire for the two groups of patients with comparative analysis of nursing care. Results: The SAS scores and the SDS scores of the intervention group were lower than those of the intervention group after intervention. The differences between the two groups were significant and significant (P <0.05). The average quality of life of patients in the observation group was (58.14 ± 11.20) points, while the average quality of life quality of the reference group was (87.95 ± 28.66) points. There was significant difference in the average quality of life between two groups Significance (P <0.05). Compared with the total satisfaction of the two groups, the satisfaction degree of the nursing group in the observation group was 100%, which was 17.00% higher than the reference group. Comparing the two groups of data, the difference was significant (χ2 = 17.2896, P <0.05), with statistical significance. Conclusion: Individualized nursing intervention in convalescent elderly patients with myocardial infarction can effectively improve the therapeutic effect, improve the quality of life in elderly patients with myocardial infarction, and at the same time, can significantly reduce the incidence of complications and further improve the psychological status of patients. Can be further analyzed for use.