论文部分内容阅读
Objective:The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of single-agent gemcitabine in the maintenance treatment of histologically confirmed metastatic breast cancer cases.Methods:The 45 patients carried efficacious chemotherapy were divided into maintenance therapy group(n=23) and control group(n=22) according to the different treatment methods.Patients in the maintenance therapy group received gemcitabine therapy until 6 cycles,disease progression or adverse effect intolerance.Within the control group,the patients were given best supportive care.Follow-up was made until disease progression,death or 2 years.The short-term clinical efficacy and adverse effects,progression-free survival(PFS) and median survival of recurrence(MSR) of these two groups were compared and analyzed.Results:Compared with the control group,the experiment group had higher response rate(RR;73.9% vs 31.8%;P<0.05),and significantly progress of median PFS(13.1 vs 9.6 months;P<0.05).However,the progression of MSR had no statistically difference with the control group(23.3 vs 21.1 months;P>0.05).Most of the treatment-related adverse events were mild,and the most common adverse event was hematologic toxicity.The 3 cases occurred grades 3–4 neutropenia and 3 cases occurred grades 3–4 thrombocytopenia.The 1 patient stopped treatment because of grade 3 allergic reaction,and 4 patients required dose reduction for grade 4 adverse events.Other adverse effects were grades 1–2,and all were recovered after symptomatic treatment.There was no significant side effect which threatened the life.Conclusion:In the extension maintenance treatment,gemcitabine can consolidate the therapeutic effect in advance and significantly prolong median PFS of metastatic breast cancer patients.In conclusion,gemcitabine monotherapy with a favorable safety profile is an effective maintenance treatment in metastatic breast cancer patients.
Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of single-agent gemcitabine in the maintenance treatment of histologically confirmed metastatic breast cancer cases. Methods: The 45 patients carried efficacious chemotherapy were divided into maintenance therapy group (n = 23) and control group (n = 22) according to the different treatment methods. Patients in the maintenance therapy group received gemcitabine therapy until 6 cycles, disease progression or adverse effect intolerance. Whith the control group, the patient were given the best supportive care. up was made until disease progression, death or 2 years. short-term clinical efficacy and adverse effects, progression-free survival (PFS) and median survival of recurrence (MSR) of these two groups were compared and analyzed. Results: Compared with the control group, the experiment group had higher response rate (RR; 73.9% vs 31.8%; P <0.05), and significantly progress of median PFS (13.1 vs 9.6 months; P < rogression of MSR had no comparison difference with the control group (23.3 vs 21.1 months; P> 0.05) .Most of the treatment-related adverse events were mild, and the most common adverse event was hematologic toxicity. 3 cases occurred grades 3- 4 neutropenia and 3 cases occurred grades 3-4 thrombocytopenia.The 1 patient stopped treatment because of grade 3 allergic reaction, and 4 patients required dose reduction for grade 4 adverse events. Each effect effects were grades 1-2, and all were recovered after symptomatic treatment. There was no significant side effect that threatened the life. Confc: In the extension maintenance treatment, gemcitabine can consolidate the therapeutic effect in advance and significantly prolong median PFS of metastatic breast cancer patients. In conclusion, gemcitabine monotherapy with a favorable safety profile is an effective maintenance treatment in metastatic breast cancer patients.