论文部分内容阅读
写了不少反腐言论,读过不少网上跟贴。这些跟贴,有的给我思路上的启发,有的开阔我的视野,有的起到了纠偏补遗的作用,总之,获益匪浅。惟独对有一类跟贴不以为然,这类跟贴集中起来,便是表达这样的一个论点,即:反腐,不要弄得人人自危啊。比如,我发表了一篇题为《要警示,更应公示》的言论,在肯定警示谈话功用后,我提出,对于警示谈话的对象及谈话内容,应予公示,实施“阳光操作”。这既是立党为公执政为民的本质要求,又是惩前毖后治病救人的有力举指。这篇文章在网上公开发表后,这类跟贴出现了,意思是,若将警示谈话对象的名单及谈话内容公示,不就会搞得人人自危了吗?这样的担心,明显是在强词夺理。反腐败是什么?是让廉洁清明存于世间,让腐败贪婪无容身之地。即使是警示谈话,其对象也是有了一些苗头性
Write a lot of anti-corruption statements, read a lot of online follow. These follow up, and some ideas inspired me, and some broaden my horizons, and some played a corrective addendum role, in short, benefited. However, it is only right to disagree with the fact that there is a class of follow-up. Such a focus is to express such an argument that anti-corruption should not be put at risk to everyone. For example, I published an article titled “To Be Cautionary and Should Be Publicized.” After I affirmed the function of warning, I proposed that for the object and the content of the conversation to be warned, we should publicize and implement the “sunshine operation” . This is not only the essential requirement of building a party for the public to govern for the people, but also a powerful measure for saving and saving the sick after the last resort. After the article was published on the Internet, such kind of follow-up appeared, which meant that if the lists of the target of the conversation and the content of the conversation were publicized, would everyone be at risk? The apprehension obviously lies behind Predicament. What is anti-corruption? It is to keep corruption clean and save the world so that corruption and greed can not be tolerated. Even if the warning talk, the object is also some signs of sex