论文部分内容阅读
现在比较热门的是把自然科学的三论——信息论、控制论、系统论引入文学。我原则地、经验地、又是直觉地认为,这样的尝试是有益的,无可厚非,不应苛求苛责。同时也不必过分哄抬。这是因为,首先,艺术与科学面对的是同一个世界,科学上的每一个最新的成就不仅从具体的知识上而且也从总体的认识世界(包括认识人自身)的能力上,被文学艺术家所吸收。其次,这是文艺学术本身的性质所决定的。文艺学是一门充满内在的深刻矛盾的学科。因为它第一是文艺,第二它是科学,它与一切其它的科学门类一样,要求具有科学的明晰性、逻辑性、确定性与系统性。创作家和重感觉、重体验、重欣赏的评论家对于用科学方法为文艺立法的意图往往抱着十足的反
What is hot now is to introduce the three theories of natural science - information theory, cybernetics and system theory into literature. I know, empirically and intuitively, that such an attempt is useful, groundless, and not demanding demanding. Also do not have to drive too much. This is because, first of all, art and science face the same world, and every latest accomplishment in science is influenced not only by specific knowledge but also by the general ability to recognize the world, including one’s own, Absorbed by the artist Second, this is determined by the nature of literature and art itself. Literature and Art is a discipline full of inner profound contradictions. Because it is the first to be art, and secondly to science, like all other sciences, it requires scientific clarity, logic, certainty, and systematicness. Writers and critics who value heavy experience, heavy appreciation appreciate their tendencies toward the intent of using literary and artistic methods as scientific methods