论文部分内容阅读
我国在由单一的计划经济向有计划的商品经济转变过程中,走什么样的发展路子更适合我国的国情?更能促进我国商品经济的发展?这是个众人关心的问题。过去的几年,从沿海到内地,从领导到基层相当一部分同志认为应走“贸工农”的发展路子。这条路子到底如何?在治理整顿中,对其进行重新认识和反思是十分必要的.我们认为,发展社会主义初级阶段的有计划的商品经济,“贸工农”的路子不可取,而应走“农工贸”的路子。“农工贸”和“贸工农”,虽然同样是这三个字。但因排列顺序的不同,发展重点的不同,反映了发展我国经济的两条不同的思路。我们之所以认为“贸工农”不可取,是因为至少有两个方面的原因需要商榷:
In the process of transforming from a single planned economy to a planned one in our country, what kind of development path should be more suitable for our country’s national conditions and more for the development of China’s commodity economy? This is a matter of public concern. In the past few years, a considerable number of comrades from the coast to the interior and from the leadership to the grassroots think it is time to take the path of development of “trade, industrial and agricultural means.” In the process of reorganization and reorganization, it is necessary to reconsider and reconsider this. We believe that to develop a planned commodity economy in the initial stage of socialism, the path of “trade, industrial and agricultural means” is undesirable and should go “Agriculture, Industry and Trade” road. “Agriculture, Industry and Trade” and “Trade and Industry”, although the same three words. However, due to differences in the order of arrangement, differences in development priorities reflect two different ideas for developing our economy. The reason why we think that “trade, industrial and agricultural” is not desirable is because there are at least two reasons that need to be discussed: