论文部分内容阅读
关于法院选择协议的准据法是法院地法还是基础合同准据法问题,国际社会一直存在“统一论”和“分割论”两种观点。对此,普通法法系认为法院选择协议的程序性问题和实体性问题是可分的,程序性问题包括可执行性问题,实体性问题包括解释性问题,因而程序性问题适用法院地法,实体性问题适用基础合同准据法。普通法法系的处理方式对于解决我国法院选择协议的准据法问题具有启发意义。
As to whether the law applicable to the court’s choice of agreement is the law of the court or the basis of the contract, the international community has always had two kinds of views: “unification” and “division.” In this regard, common law law considers the procedural issues and substantive issues of the court’s choice of agreement to be dividable. Procedural issues include enforceability issues. Substantive issues include interpretative issues, and procedural issues therefore apply to court law. Substantive issues apply to the basic contract law. The way of common law law system is enlightening for solving the law of application of the court choice agreement in our country.