论文部分内容阅读
随着学界对民间法研究转向司法实践,民间法与法律方法的勾连问题不可避免地成为民间法研究中重要的内容。正是在法官对大小前提的建构过程中,民间法与法律方法的勾连成为一种可能,与此同时也为民间法司法运用提供了方法上的支持。具体而言,民间法可以通过法律发现进入司法,作为法律的解释源进入司法,通过利益衡量补充法律漏洞,作为经验法则认定案件事实,以及作为法律论证的理由。深入研究民间法与法律方法的可能勾连,有利于建立起本土化的法律方法论体系,从而促进法律方法论学科的建设。
As academics shift the study of folk law to judicial practice, the problem of the connection between civil law and legal methods inevitably becomes an important part of the study of civil law. It is precisely in the construction of the judge’s size premise that the connection between civil law and legal method is possible and at the same time provides the methodological support for the judicial application of civil law. Specifically, civil law can find its way into the judiciary through law, entering the judiciary as a legal source of interpretation, supplementing legal loopholes through the measurement of interests, finding facts of cases as a rule of thumb, and justifying legal arguments. Studying the possible linkages between civil law and legal methods is conducive to establishing a local legal methodology system so as to promote the construction of legal methodology.