论文部分内容阅读
融贯(coherence)在这里是一种关于司法裁判过程中法律论证合理性的标准,也是判定具备可接受性的论证结论是否已经得出,即法律论证的终止的标准。其中描述性融贯,或者事实性融贯,强调对确立案件事实过程中对于依据证据进行事实推论的证立。描述性融贯主要是为了将案件事实作为合理推论的结果,进行融贯性的检验,回归到案件事实的各种可能的反推上,通过间接证据显示的可能性合集来确定最具备现实可能性的案件事实模式。证据与证据之间针对特定观念看法、情境描述、事实关联的探讨也必须寻求一贯性和恰当性,而不是独立依据和确证性事物的单方展现。
Coherence here is a standard about the rationality of legal argumentation in judicial adjudication. It is also a criterion for determining whether the conclusion of an acceptable conclusion has been drawn, that is, the termination of legal argumentation. The descriptive coherence, or factual coherence, emphasizes the establishment of the factual inference based on the evidence in the process of establishing the facts of the case. Descriptive coherence is mainly to make the facts of the case as the result of reasonable inference, test the coherence, return to all possible anti-pushbacks of the facts of the case, and determine the most realistic possibility through a collection of possibilities indicated by indirect evidence Sexual facts of the case model. Evidence and evidence for the specific concept of view, situational description, the relevance of the fact that the discussion must also seek consistency and appropriateness, rather than independent and confirmatory things unilateral show.