论文部分内容阅读
长期以来,人们把马列著作,毛泽东著作称为“经典”著作,把马克思、恩格斯、列宁、斯大林、毛泽东称为“经典作家”,习以为常,积非成是。仔细推敲,“经典”二字的提法,极不正确。首先,从“经典”的本意来看。基督教的《新约全书》、《旧约全书》号称圣经,穆罕默德创立的伊斯兰教信仰的经典是《古兰经》,佛教的创始人释迦牟尼八十岁时入了涅槃(去世)他的弟子们把他的一生说法苦、集、灭、道四谛记录整理成为经典,继续传布,遂成佛教。中国封建社会的四书五经,儒家奉为经典,要求信徒字字背诵,句句照办,盖出于此。故把马列著作称为“经典”著
For a long time, Marx and Engels, Lenin, Stalin and Mao Tse-tung called “classic writers” by Marx and Lenin in the works of Marxism-Leninism and Mao Zedong. Careful scrutiny, “classic” two-word formulation, extremely incorrect. First of all, from the “classic” point of view. Christian “New Testament”, “Old Testament” is the bible, Muhammad founded the Islamic religion is the classic “Qur’an”, the founder of Buddhism Sakyamuni into Nirvana (died) at age 80 His disciples They put his life to say bitter, set, destroy, record the four truths recorded as classic, continue to spread, then into Buddhism. China’s feudal society, the Four Books and Five Classics, Confucianism as a classic, require the believers to recite the word, sentence according to do, out of this. Therefore, the writings of Marx and Lenin called “classic” with