论文部分内容阅读
偶然从报上看到一篇“此保险与那保险”的议论文.文中主要讲保险公司开办的产品责任保险令人不知是喜还是忧.喜的是购回的商品出了毛病,有“保险”,毕竟是件好事情,忧的一是责任保险只对后果负责,保不了产品本身的质量;二是耽心企业有了保险这个“护身符”门庭若市,仍忽视质量.文中说:“人的生命是宝贵的,而质量也是产品的生命,企业的生命,尤其是家用电器这样的产品,其质量如何关系到“双重”的生命,万分之一的次品,对于用户来说,都是百分之百的灾难.”该文发出质疑,仅靠保险能解决吗?从这则短文看出,作者对保险
Occasionally read from the newspaper saw an article, “This insurance and that insurance,” the essay, mainly in charge of insurance companies to open product liability insurance I do not know whether it is happy or sad. Hi is the purchase of goods out of order, the “ Insurance ”, after all, is a good thing, the worry is that liability insurance is only responsible for the consequences, can not guarantee the quality of the product itself; Second, worry about the insurance company with the“ amulet ”dignified, still ignoring the quality of the article said: Of life is precious, and quality is also the life of the product, the life of the enterprise, especially the products of household appliances, how its quality is related to the “double” life, one ten thousandth inferior products, to the users Is one hundred percent disaster. "The article questioned, can only be solved by insurance? From this short essay, the author of the insurance