论文部分内容阅读
《最高人民法院关于抢劫过程中故意杀人案件如何定罪问题的批复》(下文称《批复》)中规定:“行为人为劫取财物而预谋故意杀人,或者在劫取财物过程中,为制服被害人的反抗而故意杀人的,以抢劫罪定罪处罚。”如果行为人为达到劫取财物的目的而预谋故意杀人且实施了杀人的行为,但由于意志以外的原因仅造成被害人轻伤的后果是否可以适用本《批复》?本文拟以笔者自身承办的一起案件为引,试讨论在这种情况下的行为如何定罪量刑更能体现罪责刑相适应原则。
The Reply of the Supreme People’s Court on How to Conviction the Intentional Homicide Case in the Process of Robbery (the “Reply”) states: "The perpetrator premeditated intentional homicide in the context of robbery of property, or in the process of robbery of property, If the perpetrator premeditated murder and attempted murder for the purpose of robbery, the consequence of only causing minor injuries to the victim for reasons other than will may be This article is intended to cite one case that the author himself undertakes as a guide to discuss how to convict and sentence the behavior in such circumstances to better reflect the principle of the adaptation of crime and punishment.