论文部分内容阅读
反倾销作为国际贸易救济的主要方式在中国自1997年以来已经走过了十多年的历程。但是我国反倾销研究及实践的重点始终停留在原始调查领域,对反倾销行政复审,特别是日落复审的研究则少之又少。相比之下,国际反倾销实践较为均衡,基本形成了既不违背WTO规则,又兼顾本国贸易及法律惯例的国内法体系。本文运用比较法研究和案例分析的方法,阐述反倾销日落复审制度的基本原理并重点分析日落复审的程序规则和实体规则,目的在于通过分析国际法和各国国内法的日落复审立法和实践并结合我国已有案例,对反倾销日落复审制度有全面的认识,并结合最新国际法动向对我国反倾销日落复审制度的建立提出合理可行的建议。
Anti-dumping as the main mode of international trade remedy has gone through more than 10 years in China since 1997. However, the focus of anti-dumping research and practice in our country always stays in the field of original investigation, and the research on anti-dumping administrative review, especially the sunset review is rare. In contrast, the international anti-dumping practice is more balanced and basically forms a domestic legal system that does not violate the WTO rules while taking into account domestic trade and legal practices. This article uses the comparative law research and case analysis methods to elaborate the basic principle of the anti-dumping sunset review system and focus on the analysis of the procedural rules and substantive rules of the sunset review. The purpose is to analyze the sunset review laws and practice of international law and national laws, There are cases that have a comprehensive understanding of the anti-dumping sunset review system and put forward reasonable and feasible suggestions on the establishment of China’s anti-dumping sunset review system in light of the latest trends in international law.