论文部分内容阅读
面对现实中日益多发的涉诉信访,全国各级法院基本都建立起了一套处理机制。陈志强案中,针对陈志强的信访活动,以法院为主的有关主体便需作出一定的回应,此时的涉诉信访的处理机制俨然可被视作一种社会控制机制。然涉诉信访控制机制一方面无法有效完成其本身的控制目标,即维持一定的社会秩序;另一方面又对原有司法社会控制机制造成了严重破坏。因此,必须扬司法而弃信访,并以此为方向,采取弱化涉诉信访社会控制且强化司法社会控制的现实策略。
Faced with the growing number of petition letters and visits in reality, courts at all levels across the country have basically established a set of handling mechanisms. In the case of Mr Chan, aiming at Chen Zhiqiang’s letters and visits, some related parties, mainly court-based, needed to make some response. The handling mechanism of letters and visits involving petitions at this time seems to be regarded as a kind of social control mechanism. However, on the one hand, the control mechanism of petition letters and visits can not effectively accomplish its own control objectives, that is, maintain a certain social order; on the other hand, it has caused serious damage to the original judicial social control mechanism. Therefore, we must abandon the justice and abandon the letters and visits, take this as the direction, and adopt the practical strategy of weakening the social control of the letters and visits and strengthening the judicial and social control.