论文部分内容阅读
目的:比较两种救心丸治疗冠心病心绞痛(胸痹证)的疗效.方法:将符合标准的冠心病患者100例,随机分成两组:甲组60例,服庆余救心丸每次0.7g,每日2次;乙组40例,服麝香保心丸,每次1粒,每113次.疗程14天.比较两者对心绞痛、心电图的疗效及症状改善、硝酸甘汕停减率.结果:两药心绞痛缓解率分别为9O.00％及87.5O％,心电图有效率为43.33％及4O.OO％,硝酸甘油停减率达85.11％及82.61％,无显著差异,P＞O.05.庆余救心丸起效较快、结论:两药均为治疗冠心病心绞痛的良好用药.“,”Compare the efficacy of two kinds of heart-saving pill treating angina pectoris (chest-Bi syndrome ). Methods: 100 cases of sampels were divide into two groups randomly. 60cases (Group A ) take Qin Yu Jiu Xin pills, 0. 7g every time. 2 times a day. 40 cases (Group B) take She Xiang Bao Xin pills. 1 tablet every tinies a day. One course is 14 days. Compare the effect to relieve the angina pectoris,variation of ECG,improvement of symptoms and reducing rate of nitroglycerine. Results: The relieving rate of two pills for angina pectoris is 90. 00% and 87. 50%,changement of ECG is 43. 33% and 40. 00%, reducing rate of nitroglycerine is 85. 11 % and 82.60%. There are no remarkable difference between two group,P>0. 05. But Qing Yu Jiu Xing pill effect faster than the other one. Conclusion: Both of these two medicines are good to relieve angina pectoris for coronary heart disease.