论文部分内容阅读
奥地利联邦宪法法院并未对“全面修改联邦宪法”的概念作出精确界定。自１９２０年以来，宪法解释者对这一概念的阐述已使其内容得到了很大的“丰富”并发生了巨大变化。近年来，在奥地利宪法法院的裁决中，关于对宪法可能进行全面修改的看法也越来越多。本文回顾了修宪学说的发展和在宪法法院的新近裁决中所体现出来的宪法制定者对宪法法院裁决的反应，划定了制定宪法与宪法法院的界线，在基本原则的指导下阐明了宪法法院审查法律的管辖权，并指出了这种权力在联邦宪法制定者的最终裁决权中的界限
The Austrian Federal Constitutional Court did not precisely define the concept of a “comprehensive revision of the Federal Constitution.” Since 1920, the interpretations of this concept by the constitutional interpreter have greatly enriched its content and have undergone tremendous changes. In recent years, judgments of the Austrian Constitutional Court have seen more and more opinions on the possible comprehensive revision of the Constitution. This article reviews the development of constitutional amendment theory and the reaction of constitutional law makers to the Constitutional Court ruling as reflected in the recent ruling of the Constitutional Court, which delimits the line between the constitutional and constitutional courts and clarifies the constitution under the guidance of basic principles The court examines the jurisdiction of the law and points out the limits of such power in the final decision of the federal constitutional legislator